PEORIA, Ill. (AP) — An Illinois jury has begun deliberations in the first-degree murder trial of a sheriff’s deputy who shot Sonya Massey, a Black woman in her home who had called 911 for help and was later killed due to an incident involving a pan of hot water.

The eight-woman, four-man jury received the case just after 11:30 a.m. Tuesday. They must determine if Sean Grayson, 31, is guilty of first-degree murder for fatally shooting Massey in her Springfield home. If convicted, he faces a sentence of 45 years to life in prison. They may also consider a second-degree murder charge, which could lead to a sentence of four to 20 years.

Grayson, joined by another deputy, responded to Massey’s 911 call reporting a prowler outside her home early on the morning of July 6, 2024.

During closing arguments, prosecutors portrayed Grayson as “an angry man with a gun,” arguing that his impatient reaction to Massey’s mental health crisis escalated the situation. In contrast, the defense claimed that Grayson issued clear orders to Massey to drop the pot of steaming water before he fired, arguing that the situation was misinterpreted as a threat. Massey allegedly declared, “I rebuke you in the name of Jesus,” before the shooting occurred.

Massey’s tragic death has invoked broader discussions about law enforcement's interactions with Black individuals, particularly in crisis situations. After substantial media coverage and public outcry, the trial was relocated from Springfield to Peoria due to concerns about bias.

Grayson’s defense included his own testimony, a rare move for a defendant in a murder case. He conveyed that while he deliberated using a Taser, he feared it may not be effective, leading him to draw his firearm out of a perceived threat when Massey repeated her remark after initially failing to hear her.

In this context, second-degree murder may apply if a defendant acts due to “serious provocation” that could lead a reasonable person to act in a heated, impulsive manner, often categorized as "imperfect self-defense." The jury's decision now holds significant implications for understanding police conduct and accountability.