Macrons Prepare Scientific Evidence to Counter Defamation Claims

Fri Dec 05 2025 19:30:53 GMT+0200 (Eastern European Standard Time)

Emmanuel Macron and Brigitte Macron plan to present evidence in a US court to disprove claims by Candace Owens that Brigitte was born male.

French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte, are set to confront defamation allegations made by right-wing influencer Candace Owens, who has claimed that Brigitte is a man. Their attorney has announced plans to introduce scientific and photographic evidence in court, while also addressing the emotional toll these claims have taken on the Macrons. The lawsuit, initially filed in Delaware, highlights significant issues regarding freedom of speech and the right to defend personal integrity amidst public scrutiny.

French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte, are preparing to present both photographic and scientific evidence in a US court to affirm Brigitte's gender. The couple's legal action, spearheaded against the right-wing influencer Candace Owens, comes after Owens propagated the controversial claim that Brigitte was assigned male at birth.

According to their lawyer, Tom Clare, Brigitte has been deeply affected by these allegations, describing them as incredibly upsetting and a distraction from her husband's presidential duties.

In a discussion on the BBC's Fame Under Fire podcast, Clare confirmed that the Macrons are committed to disproving these claims and will showcase expert testimony and evidence that demonstrate the allegations are false. He acknowledged the discomfort of having to undergo such public scrutiny to establish the facts.

This legal battle took a turn when Owens's lawyers countered with a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing the suit's venue in Delaware was inappropriate, asserting it does not relate to her business interests.

The roots of Owens' claim trace back several years, having gained traction initially from fringe online sources. This specific allegation culminated into a significant public discourse that the Macrons sought to unequivocally end through legal means, emphasizing their determination to defend their honor against what they regard as damaging misinformation.

Owens' allegations present a unique challenge within the context of US defamation law, particularly regarding public figures where plaintiffs need to prove actual malice, indicating that the defendant acted recklessly with the truth.

Throughout the ongoing proceedings, the integrity and emotional well-being of the Macrons, especially Brigitte, remain at the forefront of their legal strategy.