NEW YORK — The CDC's recent update declaring 'the statement "Vaccines do not cause autism" is not an evidence-based claim' has sparked outrage among public health experts. This change comes amidst increasing scrutiny of the CDC's stance on vaccine safety and has drawn sharp criticism from various healthcare professionals and advocacy groups.

The Autism Science Foundation stated their disapproval, highlighting the misleading nature of the new content that they say compromises long-standing research solidifying the safety of vaccines. We are appalled to find that the content on the CDC webpage 'Autism and Vaccines' has been changed and distorted, they remarked.

For years, a strong scientific consensus has maintained that there is no link between vaccines and autism, with numerous studies supporting this conclusion. Dr. Susan Kressly of the American Academy of Pediatrics emphasized the unequivocal nature of existing research, stating, The conclusion is clear and unambiguous.

Former CDC officials have echoed concerns regarding the integrity of information on vaccine safety being compromised, with Dr. Debra Houry noting that numerous scientists at the agency were unaware of the changes. When scientists are cut out of scientific reviews, then inaccurate and ideologic information results, she stated.

The revised CDC website continues to assert that 'Vaccines do not cause autism' but places an asterisk next to the statement, indicating ongoing changes in the department's perspective. This ambiguity raises significant concerns among experts about the implications for public health policy and vaccine uptake.

As tensions mount, prominent figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr., now secretary of Health and Human Services, have gained traction among vaccine skeptics. The CDC's surprising update raises further questions about the influence of new leadership on scientifically established vaccine communications.

Public health advocates call for immediate restoration of trust in vaccine promotion, urging the CDC to discontinue what they perceive as the endorsement of misleading claims. The impact of these changing narratives on community health and vaccination rates will be closely monitored as public discourse continues to evolve.