ATLANTA (AP) — Georgia lawmakers passed a bill early Friday that permits property owners to file claims against local governments if they believe that city policies banning outdoor sleeping and mandating law enforcement cooperation with federal immigration authorities are not enforced.
If Governor Brian Kemp signs the bill, individuals could demand compensation for alleged lost property value or incurred expenses linked to failures in enforcing policies against public camping, loitering, and sanctuary policies limiting cooperation with federal immigration agents.
Bill sponsor, Rep. Houston Gaines, emphasizes the need for accountability from local governments, noting that property owners shouldn't bear costs for localities failing to manage encampments. “Allowing illegal encampments, theft and disorder to flourish is not kindness,” Gaines stated. “It’s neglect.”
However, opposition from Democrats and homelessness advocates argues the bill could exacerbate issues surrounding homelessness by encouraging unnecessary arrests and frivolous lawsuits, funded by taxpayers. Critics advocate for investment in housing solutions instead of penalizing those without homes.
Jesse Rabinowitz, from the National Homelessness Law Center, criticized the legislation, calling it “ineffective, cruel, and makes it harder to solve homelessness,” while adding that it disproportionately targets immigrant communities.
Georgia state Senator Josh McLaurin condemned the bill, labeling it “nuclear bad policy” and expressing concern about lessening public resources due to potential court battles arising from homeowners’ claims.
Supporters of the bill claim it highlights the consequences of local authorities neglecting their responsibilities, stressing that public safety must not be compromised due to political motivations.
The bill follows a recent legal obligation for local enforcement to cooperate with federal authorities regarding undocumented immigrants, prompting legislators to propose additional measures to uphold state policies.
As the discussion continues, the proposed legislation represents a significant shift in how cities manage both homelessness and community safety, revealing deep political divides on addressing these complex social issues.






















