Skip to main content
OnPoint Now
PoliticsSerbia

Serbia's Protests: A Turning Point in Media Coverage and Political Response

State-controlled media's sudden focus on anti-government demonstrations highlights tensions within Serbia's ruling party.

By Andrew HigginsSource: nytimes.com1 min read
Serbia's Protests: A Turning Point in Media Coverage and Political Response
Image via nytimes.com

In brief

Mass protests erupted in Novi Sad as citizens demand change, revealing a shift in the media landscape, previously dominated by State narratives.

In a striking twist, Serbia's state media has shifted its stance towards the escalating protests against President Aleksandar Vucic, marking a notable change in the media landscape of the country. For months, Radio Television Serbia (RTS) had largely ignored the sweeping student-led demonstrations, which have been gaining momentum across the nation. However, during the past weekend, as tens of thousands of demonstrators took to the streets and blocked three significant bridges over the Danube River in Novi Sad, the state broadcaster opted to cover the protests extensively, placing them at the forefront of its news bulletins. The departure from previous coverage was stark; RTS reported on the protests factually and refrained from maligning the demonstrators as traitors or foreign agents, a common narrative from the ruling Serbian Progressive Party. This sudden emphasis on the rallies has not gone unnoticed by Vucic's party, which issued a rare statement denouncing RTS’s “scandalous reporting.” The party condemned the broadcaster for allegedly "siding with politicians" intent on undermining Serbia’s constitutional order.Control over the media has been a vital strategy for President Vucic, allowing him to solidify his power for over 12 years by characterizing protests negatively to suppress dissent. However, the growing scale of the demonstrations, rooted in a tragedy that claimed lives at a local train station three months ago, has challenged this status quo. As public sentiment swells against the leadership, the implications of the state's altered media stance could pave the way for greater citizen mobilization and unforeseen political shifts in the region. Whether this is a strategic recalibration by the media or a genuine acknowledgment of the public’s voice remains to be seen.

Topics

More on this story