Skip to main content
OnPoint Now
PoliticsThe 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has reinstated a $656 million judgment against the Palestinian authorities following a U.S. Supreme Court ruling. The judgment was reinstated after the Supreme Court upheld a law allowing lawsuits against foreign entities related to international terror attacks.

$656 Million Judgment Against Palestinian Authorities Reinstated

An appeal court has reinstated a substantial judgment against Palestinian authorities, influenced by a U.S. Supreme Court ruling allowing victims of international terrorism to seek justice in U.S. courts.

Source: AP1 min read

In brief

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has reinstated a $656 million judgment against the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority. This decision follows a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that clears a path for American victims of international terror attacks to pursue lawsuits against foreign entities in U.S. courts. Victims of attacks in Israel had previously sued under the Anti-Terrorism Act, claiming involvement or incitement by Palestinian agents in the attacks. Attorneys for the plaintiffs expressed relief over the long-awaited judicial decision.

NEW YORK (AP) — A $656 million judgment against Palestinian authorities has been reinstated by appeals judges, following a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in favor of Americans killed or wounded in attacks in Israel.

The decision from the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals comes a decade after it first tossed out a verdict against the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority on the grounds that U.S. courts couldn’t consider lawsuits against foreign groups over overseas attacks that were not aimed at the United States.

But the appeals court reinstated the judgment in light of a Supreme Court ruling last June upholding a 2019 law enacted by Congress to allow the victims’ lawsuits to go forward against the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority.

“We conclude that the original judgment for the plaintiffs should be reinstated. That conclusion is consistent with the plain import of the Supreme Court’s decision,” the judges stated in their ruling.

“Our client families are very relieved that the court has reinstated the judgment without requiring a new trial. They have been waiting for a very long time for justice to be done,” attorney Kent Yalowitz said in an email.

Nitsana Darshan-Leitner, another attorney for the plaintiffs, said she was pleased with the decision after 22 years of litigation.

The victims had sued under the Anti-Terrorism Act, which was signed into law in 1992 to open U.S. courts to victims of international terror attacks.

The victims and their families assert that Palestinian agents either were involved in the attacks or incited them. The Palestinians have consistently argued that the cases shouldn’t be allowed in American courts.

Emails seeking comment were sent to attorneys for the defendants on Sunday.

Topics

More on this story