Skip to main content
OnPoint Now
PoliticsUnited States

James Comey Faces Third Federal Charge Over Alleged Leak

Former FBI boss James Comey faces a third federal indictment over a 2016 leak of classified data, raising questions about the justice department's motives.

Source: bbc.co.uk1 min read
James Comey
James Comey

In brief

Former FBI chief James Comey has been charged a third time by the Justice Department, alleging a 2016 leak of national defence information. The indictment follows earlier cases that accused him of lying to Congress and threatening President Trump with an Instagram post. Comey rejects the charges, calling the move an abuse of power, while legal experts weigh its timing and potential limits. The case coincides with a judge’s ruling that Trump’s administration unlawfully fired his daughter, adding another layer to the saga.

The United States Department of Justice has formally charged former FBI director James Comey with two counts of leaking national‑defence information. The indictment alleges the source dates back to a 2016 conversation with the New York Times while he was the FBI chief.

This is the third criminal effort to bring Comey to trial, after earlier cases accusing him of lying to Congress and allegedly threatening President Trump with an Instagram post. Legal experts say the new charges might trigger a statute‑of‑limitations objection, potentially favoring Comey’s motion to dismiss.

In a video released to Substack, Comey condemned the actions of the Justice Department as an “appalling abuse” and maintained his innocence, saying he had not disclosed any classified material.

The indictment comes on the same day a federal judge ruled that the Trump administration unlawfully fired Comey’s daughter, Maurene, from her post as a federal prosecutor. The judge ordered her reinstatement and back pay.

Legal voices suggest the charges stem from a “revenge‑fueled” attempt by former President Trump’s former administration to target political opponents. Comey’s lawyers have filed a motion to dismiss, citing the lack of evidence and the time elapsed.

The sealed indictment leaves many questions unanswered. As the case drags into the courtroom, analysts will watch whether the DOJ’s pattern of pursuing political adversaries will hold up under scrutiny.

Topics

More on this story