Harvey Weinstein's Rape Retrial Ends in Mistrial

Mon Jun 01 2026 16:28:08 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)

The latest trial of Harvey Weinstein, concerning accusations of rape by hairstylist Jessica Mann, resulted in a mistrial as jurors could not reach a consensus on the verdict. The outcome raises questions about the future of this high-profile case amidst ongoing #MeToo discourse.

Jurors in Harvey Weinstein's rape retrial could not reach an agreement, resulting in a declared mistrial in a case that has already seen multiple trials. Weinstein's attorneys expressed satisfaction with the outcome, while the accuser, Jessica Mann, continues to seek justice. The Manhattan District Attorney will consult with Mann about the next steps, as public opinions about the case circulate amid #MeToo movement implications.

NEW YORK (AP) — Jurors deadlocked in Harvey Weinstein’s rape retrial Friday, forcing another mistrial in a #MeToo-era case that has gone to trial three times so far.

While the former Hollywood mogul has been convicted of other sex crimes across the United States and remains incarcerated, the mistrial leaves the New York rape charge in limbo. Prosecutors are considering a fourth trial after some jurors indicated that nine out of twelve favored acquitting Weinstein.

Weinstein, now 74, displayed little reaction while leaving the court, although his attorneys expressed satisfaction with the outcome. Attorney Marc Agnifilo remarked, Maybe it’s not the win that he wanted, but it’s a win, and we’re going to keep fighting,” noting the defense’s belief in strong prospects for any future retrial.

The jury, predominantly male, was tasked with determining whether Weinstein raped Jessica Mann, a hairstylist and aspiring actress. Weinstein's defense argued that the encounter was consensual, relating to a complex relationship that spanned over several years.

Deliberations began on Wednesday and turned complicated quickly. On Friday, after receiving messages from the jury indicating they were at an impasse, Judge Curtis Farber declared a mistrial.

Jurors' Perspectives

Some jurors voiced their concerns over the inconsistencies in Mann's testimony. Juror Josh Hadar mentioned that there were significant gaps that led to reasonable doubt regarding the accusations. Similarly, Sarae Perez, reflecting on her well-versed knowledge of feminism and #MeToo, noted uncertainties in Mann’s account that inhibited a conviction.

In response to the mistrial, Mann stated, The mistrial doesn’t in any way detract from the truth I told. I deserve justice, which is why I stand up and face unbearable public scrutiny in the name of a greater good.” Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg praised Mann's determination and courage, confirming that prosecutors would discuss potential next steps with her shortly.

The Case's History

Weinstein, a once-powerful figure in Hollywood, became a blue-chip subject in the #MeToo movement after a wave of allegations against him surfaced in 2017, ultimately leading to his conviction on certain charges. However, some allegations, including Mann’s, continue to pursue justice through the legal system.

Mann, who asserts that Weinstein sexually assaulted her in March 2013 at a Manhattan hotel, maintained that she consistently rejected his advances. Despite her allegations, her relationship with Weinstein saw a mix of personal and professional interactions that were brought into question during the trial.

In conclusion, while Weinstein enjoys some relief today, the legal battle around him is far from settled, as discussions about potential future actions unfold.