The new restrictions target 12 countries while incorporating clearer definitions and exemptions compared to previous bans.
Trump's Revised Travel Ban: Legal Experts Weigh In on Strategic Changes

Trump's Revised Travel Ban: Legal Experts Weigh In on Strategic Changes
A sweeping new travel ban faces scrutiny but may sidestep past legal challenges, experts suggest.
In a notable revival of a contentious policy from his first term, US President Donald Trump has announced a new travel ban that applies to individuals from 12 nations primarily located in the Middle East, Africa, and the Caribbean, including Afghanistan, Iran, and Somalia. Experts are highlighting significant changes compared to Trump’s initial travel ban issued in 2017, which sparked widespread protests and faced numerous legal hurdles.
Unlike the previous ban, which was perceived as aimed specifically at Muslim-majority countries and was labeled the "Muslim ban" by critics, this new order appears to have been crafted with more care to withstand legal scrutiny. Legal scholars suggest that lessons learned from earlier attempts have led to a more robust policy that defines its terms more clearly and includes outlined exemptions.
Christi Jackson, an immigration law expert at Laura Devine Immigration in London, points out that the new restrictions are “wider in scope” and offer “clearly defined” exceptions. Meanwhile, Barbara McQuade, a law professor at the University of Michigan, echoed sentiments that the revised ban may pass legal challenges more successfully due to the apparent lack of a specific religious target.
The current travel ban resembles the scaled-back version upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018 and has been made public in the wake of a violent incident in Boulder, Colorado, which Trump used to underscore perceived security threats. However, critics note the absence of some countries, like Egypt, on the ban list, even when nationals from those locations were involved in troubling incidents, raising questions about the thresholds used for such policies.
In the midst of these developments, some nations targeted by the ban expressed outrage. Venezuela labeled the Trump administration as "supremacists," while Somalia indicated a willingness to address the concerns exhibited by the US.
Unlike the original ban which had a defined expiration period, this new executive order carries no end date, signaling a more prolonged impact. The previous ban instigated considerable unrest in airports and received heavy backlash, with President Joe Biden eventually repealing it in 2021, condemning it as "a stain on our national conscience."