In September, a Nigerian deportee recounted the nightmarish ordeal of being forcibly removed during a midnight raid by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers. Shackled and placed in a full-body restraint device known as the WRAP, he and other detainees were informed they would be sent to Ghana, despite not being from there. When the group requested to speak to their attorney, they were met with refusal and were subjected to further restraints, a practice implicated in ongoing lawsuits against ICE.
Commonly referred to as ‘the burrito’ or ‘the bag,’ the WRAP has gained notoriety as a harrowing component of the deportation process, with multiple former detainees branding the experience akin to a kidnapping. A recent investigation highlighted numerous instances where ICE deployed this device on individuals during deportation flights, allegedly causing physical and psychological trauma. Legal experts and human rights advocates now raise concerns that its continued use amounts to cruel treatment, especially amidst reports of fatalities involving the WRAP in various law enforcement contexts.
As ICE strives to meet aggressive deportation quotas, the application of the WRAP remains a point of contention that advocates claim diverges from humane treatment protocols. Notably, a report by the Department of Homeland Security in 2023 flagged pressing issues surrounding the use of the WRAP, urging clearer guidelines and training for agents tasked with its application.
Deportees like Juan Antonio Pineda, who faced undue force and restraint after seeking legal recourse, and the Nigerian man facing deportation to Ghana, echo sentiments of fear and dehumanization. Eyewitness accounts note that detainees have been left in the WRAP for hours, often with scant attention to their basic needs, raising ethical questions about the policies of immigration enforcement in the United States.
As the situation unfolds, the debate surrounding ICE’s practices continues to garner significant public attention, prompting broader discussions about immigration enforcement and the rights of those targeted under such policies.
Commonly referred to as ‘the burrito’ or ‘the bag,’ the WRAP has gained notoriety as a harrowing component of the deportation process, with multiple former detainees branding the experience akin to a kidnapping. A recent investigation highlighted numerous instances where ICE deployed this device on individuals during deportation flights, allegedly causing physical and psychological trauma. Legal experts and human rights advocates now raise concerns that its continued use amounts to cruel treatment, especially amidst reports of fatalities involving the WRAP in various law enforcement contexts.
As ICE strives to meet aggressive deportation quotas, the application of the WRAP remains a point of contention that advocates claim diverges from humane treatment protocols. Notably, a report by the Department of Homeland Security in 2023 flagged pressing issues surrounding the use of the WRAP, urging clearer guidelines and training for agents tasked with its application.
Deportees like Juan Antonio Pineda, who faced undue force and restraint after seeking legal recourse, and the Nigerian man facing deportation to Ghana, echo sentiments of fear and dehumanization. Eyewitness accounts note that detainees have been left in the WRAP for hours, often with scant attention to their basic needs, raising ethical questions about the policies of immigration enforcement in the United States.
As the situation unfolds, the debate surrounding ICE’s practices continues to garner significant public attention, prompting broader discussions about immigration enforcement and the rights of those targeted under such policies.
