In a recent legislative draft issued by the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, Republicans propose selling between 2.2 million and 3.3 million acres of federal land over five years to potential buyers, predominantly aimed at increasing housing availability. This plan is part of a larger tax and spending package associated with President Trump's administration.
Responses to this plan are mixed within the party. Some conservative lawmakers express concern over the long-term implications of selling public lands. Notably, former Interior Secretary and Republican Representative Ryan Zinke has previously voiced his discontent with similar proposals, highlighting the irreversible consequences of such sales. “Once the land is sold, we will never get it back,” he stated.
The draft legislation could generate up to $10 billion, with identified lands across 11 states including Alaska, California, and Colorado. Significantly, Montana, where Zinke hails from, is not included in the draft.
Senator Mike Lee of Utah, who chairs the Energy Committee, argues that the plan serves the dual purpose of alleviating federal liabilities while also making housing more accessible for American families. However, environmental groups and some within the party remain wary of the sale's implications for public land conservation and long-term resource management.
Responses to this plan are mixed within the party. Some conservative lawmakers express concern over the long-term implications of selling public lands. Notably, former Interior Secretary and Republican Representative Ryan Zinke has previously voiced his discontent with similar proposals, highlighting the irreversible consequences of such sales. “Once the land is sold, we will never get it back,” he stated.
The draft legislation could generate up to $10 billion, with identified lands across 11 states including Alaska, California, and Colorado. Significantly, Montana, where Zinke hails from, is not included in the draft.
Senator Mike Lee of Utah, who chairs the Energy Committee, argues that the plan serves the dual purpose of alleviating federal liabilities while also making housing more accessible for American families. However, environmental groups and some within the party remain wary of the sale's implications for public land conservation and long-term resource management.
