The investigation into Air India Flight 171's catastrophic crash continues, with many details still unclear despite a preliminary report hinting at possible pilot error. Criticism of the report’s lack of critical information has intensified discussions over the accident's causes, leading to calls for caution against premature conclusions.
Unanswered Questions Surround Air India Flight 171 Crash Investigation

Unanswered Questions Surround Air India Flight 171 Crash Investigation
Speculation mounts as preliminary report raises concerns about pilot actions and crucial information remains undisclosed after the tragic crash of Air India Flight 171.
As investigations unfold regarding the disaster of Air India Flight 171, which ended tragically with the loss of 241 lives onboard and 19 fatalities on the ground, critical questions linger unanswered. Released just recently, the preliminary report by India's Air Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) offers limited insights while igniting a whirlwind of speculation around the crash's cause shortly after take-off from Ahmedabad en route to London.
Despite compliance with international regulations mandating an initial report within 30 days, the AAIB’s 15-page document has led to discontent and confusion regarding its findings. While it does outline that two fuel cut-off switches were maneuvered into the "cut-off" position mere seconds after take-off, resulting in engine failure, it stops short of determining the exact causes behind the fatal event.
The report notes a mysterious exchange between pilots, where one queried about a potential cutoff, while the other denied it. This lack of clarity, including the absence of a complete transcript from the cockpit voice recorder (CVR), has provoked widespread concern. Pilots and industry experts have heavily criticized the investigation as being selective in information disclosure, with many stating it fails to present a full narrative of the crash.
Commentators have even suggested that the accident may have been intentionally caused by one of the pilots, a claim that has sparked outrage from the Indian Commercial Pilots' Association (ICPA). The association rebuked such allegations, deeming them irresponsible and insensitive to those affected.
In a memo to staff, Air India’s CEO echoed these sentiments, urging restraint when forming conclusions. Nonetheless, as aviation experts analyze the AAIB's report, it suggests more information is currently withheld than disclosed, raising concerns over proper accountability and transparency during the investigation.
Technicians and analysts pointed to missing context regarding the pilots’ actions in the cockpit right before the engines were turned off and later attempted to be restarted. Bjorn Fehrm, an aeronautical analyst, criticized the lack of detail surrounding engine operations connected to the switch movements, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive report that doesn't resort to ambiguous language.
Moreover, the report referenced a concerning 2018 safety bulletin by the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which warned about similar fuel switch issues across Boeing models, leading to speculation regarding possible malfunctions. However, internal FAA communications have since stated that the situation does not compromise safety, complicating the narrative further.
As the investigation progresses, industry insiders suspect that vital information may be deliberately obscured, leading to conflicting opinions among those trying to piece together what happened exactly on Flight 171. The final report is mandated to be completed within a year of the incident, yet based on past experiences, stakeholders may be in for a lengthy wait for clarity. The aftermath of the tragedy looms large over the aviation world as critical discussions regarding safety protocols and pilot responsibility evolve.