As data centers expand across the U.S., communities like Fayette County, Georgia, are grappling with water shortages and pollution. Residents, such as Beverly Morris, are raising alarms about how these facilities jeopardize their water quality and daily life, leading to a push for more sustainable practices within the tech industry.
The Water Crisis Next Door: Residents' Struggle Amid Rising Data Center Boom

The Water Crisis Next Door: Residents' Struggle Amid Rising Data Center Boom
In rural Georgia, residents face water quality issues due to nearby data centers, prompting concerns over the environmental impact of growing technology infrastructure.
Article:
When Beverly Morris envisioned her retirement in 2016, she thought she'd found a serene corner of rural Georgia. However, the tranquility of her home has been shattered by the relentless growth of nearby data centers. Situated a mere 400 yards from her front door in Fayette County stands a substantial facility owned by Meta, the parent company of Facebook.
"I can't live in my home with half of it functioning and no water," Morris states. Her primary water source, a personal well, has been impacted by sediment build-up, which she attributes to the operations of the data center. Her current reality involves using buckets to flush her toilet, and despite her attempts to salvage her plumbing, the water remains unfit for drinking. "Am I worried about it? Yes," she admits, still relying on it for cooking and oral hygiene.
Meta contends that there’s no correlation between the center's activities and Morris's water troubles. A report commissioned by the company asserts that their operations have not harmed groundwater conditions. Nevertheless, Morris feels unwelcome, lamenting that her "perfect spot" now feels compromised.
This story is not isolated; similar data centers are springing up across Georgia, transforming perceptions of the cloud from an abstract concept into a visible and tangible reality. With online demands surging, especially those driven by artificial intelligence, local opposition is also mounting. Activist group Data Center Watch notes that projects worth $64 billion have been delayed or halted due to community pushback.
Water sustainability is pressing, as data centers require extensive resources to cool their operations. "The surface of each chip is hotter than the surface of the sun," Marks Mills of the National Center for Energy Analytics testified recently, warning that it takes immense amounts of water to manage these temperatures. Some centers utilize evaporative cooling systems that can consume millions of gallons daily.
In Georgia's humid climate, water resources are abundant but facing scrutiny. Gordon Rogers, director of Flint Riverkeeper, highlights the environmental deterioration of local waterways arising from construction runoff. Meanwhile, companies like Quality Technology Services assure compliance with environmental standards, yet local residents bear the consequences.
Tech giants are becoming aware of these issues. Amazon Web Services (AWS), which operates a substantial number of data centers, claims its goal is to replenish water resources in regions they're based. Initiatives such as rainwater harvesting and collaborations with local farmers aim to alleviate water pollution and usage.
Despite these efforts, concerns remain palpable among residents. A single AI query could consume as much water as a small bottled drink, raising alarms about cumulative impacts given millions of daily requests.
As technology continuously evolves, experts like Professor Rajiv Garg recognize that these facilities are integral to our future, though they urge the adoption of more efficient cooling solutions and long-term sustainability practices. The challenge moving forward lies in balancing data-driven progress with the preservation of critical resources.
In light of the unyielding demand for technological infrastructure, Beverly Morris and others find themselves navigating the intersection of personal and national landscapes. For them, the change brought by these centers isn't merely technological—it's also profoundly personal, as they strive to safeguard the most essential resource of all: water.
When Beverly Morris envisioned her retirement in 2016, she thought she'd found a serene corner of rural Georgia. However, the tranquility of her home has been shattered by the relentless growth of nearby data centers. Situated a mere 400 yards from her front door in Fayette County stands a substantial facility owned by Meta, the parent company of Facebook.
"I can't live in my home with half of it functioning and no water," Morris states. Her primary water source, a personal well, has been impacted by sediment build-up, which she attributes to the operations of the data center. Her current reality involves using buckets to flush her toilet, and despite her attempts to salvage her plumbing, the water remains unfit for drinking. "Am I worried about it? Yes," she admits, still relying on it for cooking and oral hygiene.
Meta contends that there’s no correlation between the center's activities and Morris's water troubles. A report commissioned by the company asserts that their operations have not harmed groundwater conditions. Nevertheless, Morris feels unwelcome, lamenting that her "perfect spot" now feels compromised.
This story is not isolated; similar data centers are springing up across Georgia, transforming perceptions of the cloud from an abstract concept into a visible and tangible reality. With online demands surging, especially those driven by artificial intelligence, local opposition is also mounting. Activist group Data Center Watch notes that projects worth $64 billion have been delayed or halted due to community pushback.
Water sustainability is pressing, as data centers require extensive resources to cool their operations. "The surface of each chip is hotter than the surface of the sun," Marks Mills of the National Center for Energy Analytics testified recently, warning that it takes immense amounts of water to manage these temperatures. Some centers utilize evaporative cooling systems that can consume millions of gallons daily.
In Georgia's humid climate, water resources are abundant but facing scrutiny. Gordon Rogers, director of Flint Riverkeeper, highlights the environmental deterioration of local waterways arising from construction runoff. Meanwhile, companies like Quality Technology Services assure compliance with environmental standards, yet local residents bear the consequences.
Tech giants are becoming aware of these issues. Amazon Web Services (AWS), which operates a substantial number of data centers, claims its goal is to replenish water resources in regions they're based. Initiatives such as rainwater harvesting and collaborations with local farmers aim to alleviate water pollution and usage.
Despite these efforts, concerns remain palpable among residents. A single AI query could consume as much water as a small bottled drink, raising alarms about cumulative impacts given millions of daily requests.
As technology continuously evolves, experts like Professor Rajiv Garg recognize that these facilities are integral to our future, though they urge the adoption of more efficient cooling solutions and long-term sustainability practices. The challenge moving forward lies in balancing data-driven progress with the preservation of critical resources.
In light of the unyielding demand for technological infrastructure, Beverly Morris and others find themselves navigating the intersection of personal and national landscapes. For them, the change brought by these centers isn't merely technological—it's also profoundly personal, as they strive to safeguard the most essential resource of all: water.