Facing growing public pessimism about his handling of the economy, US President Donald Trump has fired off a flurry of proposals to address consumer concerns.
Trump previously downplayed concerns about cost of living, insisting the outlook had improved during his nine months in office. He said affordability was a new word, and a con job by Democrats.
But he has focused on the issue with some urgency since his Republican Party's poor performance in last week's off-year elections across a handful of states.
He is again proposing an idea to give most Americans a $2,000 (£1,500) subsidy. In reality the payments would operate more like a rebate for federal revenue generated by his tariffs on foreign imports.
The rest of the tariff revenue, he has said, would go to reducing the federal budget deficit.
According to economists, however, the tariff revenue isn't nearly enough to cover the $2,000 rebate plan, even with the most generous assumptions and a narrow definition of those with incomes to qualify.
If we take something like a cut-off of $100,000 a year in income, the minimum cost would be about $300bn, which would absorb all of the tariff revenue that's been taken in so far and would require some deficit financing, says Erica York, vice-president of tax policy at the non-partisan Tax Foundation.
Another of Trump's ideas involves promoting 50-year mortgages – an alternative to the standard 30-year mortgages for American home purchases. The president has touted this extended payment schedule as a way to make home ownership easier for Americans. Many in his own party, however, view it as a boon for lenders who will collect bigger fees and more interest.
Trump appears to have floated this idea without consulting senior White House advisers – a reflection of his willingness to move quickly on new ideas, but with the risk of giving his advisers little time to offer input.
All of these proposals would likely require congressional implementation, which is far from guaranteed with narrow Republican majorities in both chambers.
Trump's electoral success – his ability to challenge long-held conservative orthodoxy and overcome seemingly formidable public concerns - demonstrate his well-tuned political instincts. When he has sensed vulnerability in the past, he's frequently used his political rallies and public appearances to sound out new ideas and gauge popular support. However, this is harder to do from the confines of the Oval Office, which is why the White House is discussing whether he should travel the country to give speeches on the economy.


















