COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — Stephen Bryant, a 44-year-old man sentenced to death in South Carolina, has decided to face execution by firing squad on November 14. This decision makes him the third inmate this year to choose this controversial method, a new addition to the state's execution protocol.
Bryant is notorious for the heinous murder of Willard 'TJ' Tietjen, which involved brutally shooting Tietjen and subsequently desecrating the scene with bloodscrawled messages on the wall. Prosecutors have highlighted that Bryant also murdered two additional men during a series of violent incidents in the Sumter County area in 2004.
Court Challenges Loom over Execution Method
The decision to use a firing squad, comprising three volunteers shooting from a distance of 15 feet, likely sets the stage for legal challenges prior to the execution. Recent concerns were heightened following the botched execution of Mikal Mahdi, whose death became a point of contention due to the approximate duration of his suffering, which exceeded expert predictions.
Witnesses reported distressing sounds from Mahdi that raised alarms about the firing squad's reliability. Questions persist over the efficacy of the method, as it is claimed that shooters must hit the heart without necessarily destroying it.
The Firing Squad as a Controversial Choice
The introduction of the firing squad came amid a prolonged pause in executions in South Carolina, primarily because the state could not obtain the necessary drugs for lethal injections. Firing squads are rare in the U.S., with the last known executions occurring in Utah.
Bryant's scheduled execution marks the eighth since South Carolina resumed executions in 2024, with most inmates opting for lethal injection. Bryant's case resurrects discussions over the death penalty in America, particularly concerning mental health issues. His legal team asserts he had endured severe psychological trauma in the months leading up to his crimes, prompting alarming behavior and substance abuse.
The haunting legacy of his actions resonates deeply within the community, raising fundamental questions about justice, rehabilitation, and the complexities surrounding the death penalty. As Bryant's execution date approaches, further scrutiny and public discourse on these issues are anticipated.





















