Dominique Pelicot, sentenced to 20 years for orchestrating a decade-long abuse of his wife, will not appeal, but 17 of the 49 convicted assailants have filed appeals as pressure mounts and the legal timeline looms.
Appeal Wave: 17 Convicts Challenge Gisèle Pelicot Rape Case Verdicts

Appeal Wave: 17 Convicts Challenge Gisèle Pelicot Rape Case Verdicts
In the aftermath of a high-profile trial, 17 men convicted of sexual assault against Gisèle Pelicot are appealing their sentences, while the mastermind behind the crimes opts not to contest his conviction.
In a shocking development following a lengthy 15-week trial, Gisèle Pelicot, the victim of a disturbing case of orchestrated sexual violence, witnesses a significant turn of events as 17 men convicted of raping or assaulting her have announced their intention to appeal. Dominique Pelicot, the 72-year-old husband responsible for drugging and coercing numerous men to assault his wife over a decade, has chosen to accept his 20-year prison sentence, according to his attorney, Béatrice Zavarro.
Dominique's decision not to contest the conviction was made after considering the emotional toll it would inflict on Ms. Pelicot, who attended the trial almost daily. Zavarro conveyed that Dominique views Ms. Pelicot not as an adversary, but as a victim, wanting to avoid adding further distress to her already traumatic experience. Despite not appealing, he will still play a role in the appeals process as a necessary witness.
On the flip side, the men appealing their convictions contend they were misled into believing that consent was given on the day of the assaults. Lawyers for some of these men argue for reduced sentences, asserting disproportionate verdicts. Lawyer Yannick Prat, representing one of the convicted men, expressed disappointment over their nine-year sentence, emphasizing that his client had maintained his actions were misunderstood.
New proceedings set to unfold within the next year will involve a jury of public members and could lead to even stricter judgments due to the high public interest and scrutiny surrounding the case. As noted by defense attorneys, the possibility of facing a jury rather than a judge poses both risks and potential advantages — alluding to unpredictable outcomes.
Amidst this backdrop, former victims and advocates have rallied around Gisèle Pelicot's courageous choice to publicly reveal her identity, aiming to inspire others affected by sexual violence. Ms. Pelicot echoed sentiments of empowerment and defiance, urging fellow survivors to abandon feelings of shame and share their own stories.
The case has not only captured national attention in France, but it has also sparked discussions on sexual violence and justice, revealing the damaging stigma surrounding victims of such heinous crimes. As this complex situation unfolds, the legal community and public await developments with bated breath while Gisèle Pelicot continues her fight for justice.