At a time when most people use keyboards to write, does handwriting really matter?

Yes, say Indian courts, if the writer is a doctor.

Jokes around the notoriously bad handwriting of many doctors that can only be deciphered by pharmacists are common. However, the recent order from the Punjab and Haryana High Court emphasizes the criticality of clear handwriting, stating that legible medical prescription is a fundamental right that can make a difference between life and death.

This ruling emerged during a case involving allegations of serious misconduct. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri found a medico-legal report incomprehensible, which prompted his remarks on the importance of readable prescriptions.

The court criticized the lack of legibility in medical documents and proposed incorporating handwriting training in medical school curriculums, setting a deadline for transitioning to digital prescriptions.

Even as cities shift towards digital solutions, rural areas still struggle with handwritten prescriptions, drawing attention to the disparities in healthcare delivery.

Public health advocates underscore that ambiguous prescriptions can result in tragic outcomes, urging for consistent standards in prescription writing.

Historical precedents highlight ongoing concerns over poor handwriting in medicine, with past cases bringing the issue to light. Though studies contest the stereotype of doctors having the worst handwriting, the continued prevalence of misinterpreted prescriptions remains alarming.

The widespread call for reform reflects the urgent need to prioritize patient safety through clear communication in medical practices, reinforcing the foundational role of clarity in healthcare.