Wisconsin Judge Faces Federal Charges Amid Plea Negotiations

Wed Nov 19 2025 02:29:54 GMT+0200 (Eastern European Standard Time)

Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan, accused of helping an undocumented immigrant evade federal agents, is in plea negotiations as her trial approaches. The case has drawn national attention amid heightened tensions over immigration enforcement.

Hannah Dugan, a judge in Milwaukee County, is involved in ongoing plea negotiations with federal prosecutors as she prepares for trial on charges of obstruction related to an immigrant's attempted evasion of arrest. Dugan's defense argues her innocence, while the case sheds light on the broader implications of the Trump administration's immigration policies. If convicted, she could face up to six years in prison. The situation reflects the ongoing national conflict between local judiciary actions and federal immigration enforcement.

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Plea negotiations are taking place for Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan, who stands accused of aiding an immigrant in dodging federal agents. The ongoing discussions, outlined by interim U.S. Attorney Brad Schimel, offer a potential resolution to the case before its scheduled trial next month.

As prosecutors look to de-escalate the situation, Dugan's defense claims her innocence, preparing for a court battle that could impact the national conversation surrounding immigration policies implemented by the Trump administration.

In April, federal agents attempted to detain Eduardo Flores-Ruiz during a court appearance, but Dugan allegedly facilitated his escape through a private exit. His subsequent capture involved a foot chase, leading to Dugan's indictment on obstruction charges in May.

Dugan could face up to six years in prison if convicted on charges of obstruction and aiding in the concealment of an immigrant.

The implications of her case reflect the growing discord between federal enforcement agencies and local authorities, with political tensions escalating. Supporters of Dugan argue that the administration aims to set a precedent by targeting judicial figures who oppose its immigration strategies.

The case continues to unfold as both sides navigate this politically charged landscape, with the trial set to begin on December 15, and the possibility of a plea agreement indicates a complex negotiation process at play.