Skip to main content
OnPoint Now
PoliticsA recent AP-NORC poll reveals that a significant majority of U.S. adults oppose the biannual clock change associated with daylight saving time, with many preferring a permanent time system. The article explores the implications of these preferences on health, sleep, and societal norms.

The Controversy Over Daylight Saving Time: Voices Against the Clock Change

As the United States prepares to revert to standard time, new polling reveals widespread opposition to the twice-yearly clock change, with many Americans favoring permanent daylight saving time.

Source: AP2 min read

In brief

Polls indicate that the majority of U.S. adults disapprove of the current daylight saving time system, which requires changing clocks twice a year. Opinions vary, but many would prefer to maintain the extra hour of evening daylight. Critics of the time change include medical associations and public figures, while those who favor standard time cite impacts on their daily routines. The discussion continues on the potential permanence of daylight saving time amidst cultural and health considerations.

As the United States prepares to fall back to standard time this weekend, a new poll suggests that daylight saving time (DST) may be more detested than ever. At 2 a.m. local times this Sunday, clocks across the nation will revert one hour to establish standard time, marking the annual transition that starkly divides public opinion.

The AP-NORC poll highlights that a mere 12% of U.S. adults favor the current system, while 47% openly oppose it and 40% remain neutral. For many, this clock change symbolizes unwelcome darker evenings, fueling a growing desire for a permanent shift to daylight saving time.

Pranava Jayanti, a 31-year-old Los Angeles resident from India, candidly revealed that the change still surprises him every year despite attempts to prepare. His perspective echoes a larger sentiment shared by many who argue that with each passing year, the twice-annual clock setting feels more archaic.

The issue has long sparked debate among lawmakers and citizens alike, with proposals to abolish the clock-changing ritual. Notably, the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Sleep Medicine have advocated for a single, unchanging time throughout the year citing health benefits from a consistent sleep schedule.

Surprisingly, the preference for an overarching time system persists despite the known disadvantages of altering sleep habits. For many, opting for permanent daylight saving time aligns better with lifestyle patterns, particularly for 'night owls' who thrive in the later hours of the day.

However, research indicates there's no consensus on which time benefits society more. While permanent daylight saving time appeals to a majority, there remains a significant faction advocating for standard time, particularly among early risers.

This societal dilemma reflects deeper issues surrounding how time affects our daily lives and health. Feeling the weight of social and cultural pressures, citizens like 74-year-old retired nurse Vicky Robson express their desire for more light in the evening to accommodate personal routines.

The U.S. trial of permanent daylight saving time in the mid-1970s, however, ended poorly, indicating this discussion is never straightforward. As we face the onset of standard time, we remain engaged in a national conversation about how we value light, time, and our day-to-day functioning.

As the clock changes this weekend, public sentiment reflects a substantial shift — one that may demand attention from policymakers on both sides of the aisle.

Topics

More on this story