WASHINGTON (AP) — After an extended period of inactivity due to the government shutdown, House Speaker Mike Johnson has called lawmakers back into session, confronting a backlog of legislative activities that have been sidelined over the past nearly eight weeks. Hundreds of representatives are set to return on Wednesday, bringing a torrent of ideas, proposals, and frustrations stemming from their recent hiatus from work when the Republican speaker had shuttered House operations nearly two months ago.

The immediate focus will be a vote to reopen the government; however, that is only the beginning. Alongside the pressing need to resume government operations, issues related to the release of long-awaited Jeffrey Epstein files and the swearing-in of Arizona’s Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva will add further complexity to Johnson’s leadership.

Experts note the unprecedented nature of Johnson's decision to significantly limit House activity, a move that critics argue has diminished the institution’s vitality. Historically, the House has been a co-equal branch of government, expected to actively engage in legislative oversight and debate. Political analysts remark that Johnson’s strategy demonstrates a willingness to disrupt established norms, which, while consolidating his position, risks the functionality of the legislative body itself.

As lawmakers prepare for a reconvened session, Johnson’s authority will be put to the test. The speaker faces opposition from within his ranks concerning the planned funding bill, which is necessary to reopen government operations but lacks provisions to address critical health care subsidy concerns raised by Democrats. With the chamber's control narrowly split, it will be incumbent upon Johnson to rally his party and push the legislation through despite anticipated complaints.

Analysis suggests that Johnson’s governance thus far—marked by a close alignment with former President Trump and a tendency toward rigid control of the legislative agenda—will face scrutiny as larger issues loom on the horizon. Whether he can effectively manage these challenges could define his legacy in the role, as lawmakers navigate a complicated path back to effective governance.