Skip to main content
OnPoint Now
PoliticsRepublic of Ireland

Irish Justice Minister Criticises Grandparent Hug Consent Ad

The Irish Minister for Justice slammed a Dublin Rape Crisis Centre advert on consent as demeaning to grandparents after it sparked public backlash and was taken down.

Source: bbc.co.uk1 min read
Two elderly people hugging a young boy
Two elderly people hugging a young boy

In brief

Irish Justice Minister Jim O’Callaghan called a consent‑promotion clip by the Dublin Rape Crisis Centre (DRCC) “inappropriate and demeaning to grandparents.” The ad, which featured a playful hug from older relatives that made a granddaughter look uneasy, was pulled following criticism. Senator Gareth Scahill also condemned the production as a misuse of public funds. The DRCC said it would withdraw all its videos for review while stressing the “We‑Consent” programme is a long‑term effort to teach the public about consent. The controversy has sparked debate about the role of public money and messaging in social‑education campaigns.

Irish Justice Minister Criticises Grandparent Hug Consent Ad

The Irish Minister for Justice, Jim O’Callaghan, denounced a recent consent‑promotion clip by the Dublin Rape Crisis Centre (DRCC) as “inappropriate and demeaning to grandparents.”

The clip, which was removed after backlash, showed two grandparents affectionately hugging a young boy while his granddaughter appeared uneasy. The message read, “not everyone wants a hug. Even from the people who love them.”

O’Callaghan said the video was unrepresentative of the Government’s views and had wasted public funds. Fine‑Gael Senator Gareth Scahill added that the ad was “offensive and potentially damaging” to older people.

The DRCC announced it would remove all its videos from social‑media channels while reviewing their impact. It insists that its “We‑Consent” campaign is a long‑term effort to educate the public on consent, backed by the Department of Justice, the Department of Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth, and CUAN.

The controversy underscores the challenges of using public money for social‑education media and whether such messaging may miss the mark. The debate continues over how best to promote consent without alienating communities or misusing public funds.

Topics

More on this story