A US appeals court has ruled in favor of President Trump, allowing him to maintain control over National Guard troops he dispatched to Los Angeles, despite significant opposition from local leaders and California's Governor.
Trump Gains Control Over National Guard in LA Following Court Ruling
Trump Gains Control Over National Guard in LA Following Court Ruling
US Appeals Court's decision allows continued deployment of troops over local objections, amid immigration tensions.
The ruling permits the ongoing deployment of approximately 4,000 troops to the city, a move Trump justified as necessary to maintain order amid protests against his immigration policies. The three-judge panel's unanimous verdict highlighted that the President's actions fall within his legal rights to protect federal personnel and property.
Previously, a lower court judge deemed Trump's mobilization of the National Guard illegal, citing his failure to adhere to federal laws governing such deployments. The appeals court, however, stayed that ruling, affirming that Trump acted within his authority.
In response to the decision, Trump celebrated it as a significant victory, emphasizing a proactive approach to safeguarding cities. However, the court noted that Trump's use of the National Guard would still face judicial scrutiny.
Governor Newsom criticized the ruling, expressing his discontent with the notion that Trump could operate unilaterally concerning the National Guard. He affirmed his dedication to challenging any military actions against citizens.
The continuation of troop deployment is framed by the Trump administration as essential for protecting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations in Los Angeles, which have faced substantial backlash from local communities.
This scenario marks a historical moment, as it is reminiscent of prior presidential National Guard deployments lacking state approval, notably during the civil rights movements of the past.
Previously, a lower court judge deemed Trump's mobilization of the National Guard illegal, citing his failure to adhere to federal laws governing such deployments. The appeals court, however, stayed that ruling, affirming that Trump acted within his authority.
In response to the decision, Trump celebrated it as a significant victory, emphasizing a proactive approach to safeguarding cities. However, the court noted that Trump's use of the National Guard would still face judicial scrutiny.
Governor Newsom criticized the ruling, expressing his discontent with the notion that Trump could operate unilaterally concerning the National Guard. He affirmed his dedication to challenging any military actions against citizens.
The continuation of troop deployment is framed by the Trump administration as essential for protecting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations in Los Angeles, which have faced substantial backlash from local communities.
This scenario marks a historical moment, as it is reminiscent of prior presidential National Guard deployments lacking state approval, notably during the civil rights movements of the past.
