In the wake of violent incidents in Amsterdam linked to support for Palestinians, Mayor Halsema expressed regret over her use of the term "pogrom" to describe the attacks. This statement has led to a backlash from Israeli leaders who assert the term's historical context is applicable, amid rising tensions around antisemitism and Islamophobia in Europe.
Amsterdam Mayor Sparks Controversy with 'Pogrom' Remarks Following Attacks

Amsterdam Mayor Sparks Controversy with 'Pogrom' Remarks Following Attacks
The recent commentary by Mayor Femke Halsema on the term "pogrom" in relation to antisemitic violence has ignited a diplomatic firestorm and raised sensitive questions about rhetoric in a polarized political landscape.
In Amsterdam, political tensions are rising following the mayor's statement regarding violent incidents tied to a pro-Palestinian demonstration. Mayor Femke Halsema, speaking on a Dutch television program, expressed regret over using the term "pogrom" to describe the attacks that erupted on the night before a soccer match on November 7. This term historically refers to violent mob actions, usually against Jewish communities, particularly between the 1880s and the early 20th century in Eastern Europe. Halsema's comments have drawn sharp criticism from Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Saar, who asserted that the attacks should indeed be categorized as a pogrom, echoing sentiments shared by other leaders within the Israeli government.
The historical weight of the word "pogrom" has been a point of contention. It often triggers deep collective memories associated with violence against Jewish people, thus invoking a measurable response from the international Jewish community, already on high alert following the deadly Hamas-led assault on Israel in October 2023, which resulted in the tragic deaths of over 1,200 people.
The resistance to Halsema’s characterization of the events also highlights the increasing concern around weaponizing language within political discourse, particularly as Europe grapples with issues of growing antisemitism and rising anti-Muslim sentiment. The far-right Dutch politician Geert Wilders has also utilized the term, further complicating the political landscape amid accusations of fostering an anti-Muslim agenda.
As Amsterdam continues to navigate this complex and volatile situation, the invocation of historical language regarding communal violence raises crucial questions about memory, identity, and the responsibilities of modern-day political leaders in their choice of words. The discourse surrounding Halsema's remarks not only reflects local community tensions but also resonates with broader international issues surrounding human rights and the rise of extremist views in Europe.