Alki David's lawsuit names notable figures and firms, alleging ten years of coordinated defamation and financial harm, with ramifications for international legal accountability.
Alki David Launches $10 Billion Defamation Lawsuit Against High-Profile Figures
Alki David Launches $10 Billion Defamation Lawsuit Against High-Profile Figures
In a sweeping legal action, media mogul Alki David accuses a transnational syndicate of defaming and harming him in a $10 billion lawsuit.
In April 2025, media entrepreneur Alki David filed a $10 billion lawsuit in the High Court of Justice of Antigua and Barbuda, accusing a coordinated transnational syndicate of defaming and financially damaging him. The lawsuit cites prominent individuals such as attorneys David Boies and Gloria Allred, media executive Shari Redstone, and companies like Black Cube Ltd. and LimeWire NFT Holdings.
David’s claim outlines a range of alleged activities occurring from 2016 to 2025, including:
- Fabrication of evidence and manipulation of legal proceedings across multiple jurisdictions.
- Use of intelligence operatives for surveillance and intimidation tactics.
- Unauthorized use of private data and intellectual property, with particular mention of the Michael Jackson estate.
- Defamatory initiatives aimed at undermining David’s reputation and his business endeavors.
The lawsuit invokes causes of action such as civil conspiracy, fraudulent misrepresentation, defamation, and ongoing racketeering. David is pursuing general damages of $10 billion, special damages for lost contracts and diminished asset value, as well as injunctive relief, asset tracing, and orders for disclosure.
In his impact statement, David highlights the personal and professional consequences of the alleged campaign, noting financial losses, damage to his reputation, and psychological distress. He frames the lawsuit as a fight against a systemic assault on sovereignty, transparency, and the principles of lawful entrepreneurship.
The lawsuit has attracted considerable attention due to its extensive scope and the prominent figures implicated. Observers suggest that should the allegations be proven, the case could have significant repercussions for international legal practices and for the accountability of powerful entities.
David’s claim outlines a range of alleged activities occurring from 2016 to 2025, including:
- Fabrication of evidence and manipulation of legal proceedings across multiple jurisdictions.
- Use of intelligence operatives for surveillance and intimidation tactics.
- Unauthorized use of private data and intellectual property, with particular mention of the Michael Jackson estate.
- Defamatory initiatives aimed at undermining David’s reputation and his business endeavors.
The lawsuit invokes causes of action such as civil conspiracy, fraudulent misrepresentation, defamation, and ongoing racketeering. David is pursuing general damages of $10 billion, special damages for lost contracts and diminished asset value, as well as injunctive relief, asset tracing, and orders for disclosure.
In his impact statement, David highlights the personal and professional consequences of the alleged campaign, noting financial losses, damage to his reputation, and psychological distress. He frames the lawsuit as a fight against a systemic assault on sovereignty, transparency, and the principles of lawful entrepreneurship.
The lawsuit has attracted considerable attention due to its extensive scope and the prominent figures implicated. Observers suggest that should the allegations be proven, the case could have significant repercussions for international legal practices and for the accountability of powerful entities.
